MSM is one of the few drivers which won't even compile
test on !ARM platforms.
Looking into this a bit more it turned out that there is
actually not that much missing to at least let the driver
compile on x86 as well.
So this patch replaces the use of phys_to_page() with the
open coded version and provides a dummy for of_drm_find_bridge().
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210924071759.22659-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
Due to a simple typo (apparently I can't count. It goes 0, 1, 2 and
not 0, 2, 3) we were getting a kernel doc warning that looked like
this:
include/drm/drm_edid.h:530: warning:
Function parameter or member 'vend_chr_1' not described in 'drm_edid_encode_panel_id'
include/drm/drm_edid.h:530: warning:
Excess function parameter 'vend_chr_3' description in 'drm_edid_encode_panel_id'
Fix it.
Fixes: 7d1be0a09f ("drm/edid: Fix EDID quirk compile error on older compilers")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210927074104.1.Ibf22f2a0b75287a5d636c0570c11498648bf61c6@changeid
It's hard for someone (like me) who's not following closely to know
what the suggested best practices are for error printing in DRM
drivers. Add some hints to the header file.
In general, my understanding is that:
* When possible we should be using a `struct drm_device` for logging
and recent patches have tried to make it more possible to access a
relevant `struct drm_device` in more places.
* For most cases when we don't have a `struct drm_device`, we no
longer bother with DRM-specific wrappers on the dev_...() functions
or pr_...() functions and just encourage drivers to use the normal
functions.
* For debug-level functions where we might want filtering based on a
category we'll still have DRM-specific wrappers, but we'll only
support passing a `struct drm_device`, not a `struct
device`. Presumably most of the cases where we want the filtering
are messages that happen while the system is in a normal running
state (AKA not during probe time) and we should have a `struct
drm_device` then. If we absolutely can't get a `struct drm_device`
then these functions begrudgingly accept NULL for the `struct
drm_device` and hopefully the awkwardness of having to manually pass
NULL will keep people from doing this unless absolutely necessary.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210921082757.RFC.1.Ibd82d98145615fa55f604947dc6a696cc82e8e43@changeid
PTR_ERR() should access the value just tested by IS_ERR(),
otherwise the wrong error code will be returned.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Fixes: c2f17e60cb ("drm/gma500: Embed struct drm_device in struct drm_psb_private")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210924094040.3631675-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
MIPI-DSI devices need to call mipi_dsi_attach() when their probe is done
to attach against their host.
However, at removal or when an error occurs, that attachment needs to be
undone through a call to mipi_dsi_detach().
Let's create a device-managed variant of the attachment function that
will automatically detach the device at unbind.
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210910101218.1632297-5-maxime@cerno.tech
Devices that take their data through the MIPI-DSI bus but are controlled
through a secondary bus like I2C have to register a secondary device on
the MIPI-DSI bus through the mipi_dsi_device_register_full() function.
At removal or when an error occurs, that device needs to be removed
through a call to mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
Let's create a device-managed variant of the registration function that
will automatically unregister the device at unbind.
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210910101218.1632297-4-maxime@cerno.tech
Interactions between bridges, panels, MIPI-DSI host and the component
framework are not trivial and can lead to probing issues when
implementing a display driver. Let's document the various cases we need
too consider, and the solution to support all the cases.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210910101218.1632297-3-maxime@cerno.tech
The bridge documentation overview is quite packed already, and we'll add
some more documentation that isn't part of an overview at all.
Let's add some sections to the documentation to separate each bits.
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210910101218.1632297-2-maxime@cerno.tech
Implement the first version of AUX support, which will be useful as
we expand the driver to support varied use cases.
Signed-off-by: Philip Chen <philipchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
[dianders: whitespace fixes reported by dim apply-branch]
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210921110556.v6.2.I1d6ea362dc76efa77cca2b46253d31b7651eaf17@changeid
Replace the direct i2c access (i2c_smbus_* functions) with regmap APIs,
which will simplify the future update on ps8640 driver.
Signed-off-by: Philip Chen <philipchen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
[dianders: whitespace fixes reported by dim apply-branch]
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210921110556.v6.1.I2351df94f18d5d8debc22d4d100f36fac560409a@changeid
Embed struct drm_device in struct drm_psb_private. Replace the use
of dev_private by an upcast operation. Switch to managed release of
struct drm_psb_private.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210920141051.30988-4-tzimmermann@suse.de
Replace most references to struct drm_device.dev_private with the new
helper function to_drm_psb_private(). The only references left are in
assignments and the helper itself.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210920141051.30988-2-tzimmermann@suse.de
Replace arch_phys_wc_add() and arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc() with
the rsp managed functions. Allows for removing the cleanup code
for memory management
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916181601.9146-5-tzimmermann@suse.de
Replace arch_phys_wc_add() and arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc() with
the rsp managed functions. Allows for removing the cleanup code
for memory management
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916181601.9146-4-tzimmermann@suse.de
Add devm_arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc() as managed wrapper around
arch_io_reserve_memtype_wc(). Useful for several graphics drivers
that set framebuffer memory to write combining.
v2:
* fix typo in commit description
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916181601.9146-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
Add devm_arch_phys_wc_add() as managed wrapper around arch_phys_wc_add().
Useful for several graphics drivers that set framebuffer memory to write
combining.
v2:
* fix typo in commit description
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916181601.9146-2-tzimmermann@suse.de
By depending on devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(), devm_drm_of_get_bridge()
introduces a circular dependency between the modules drm (where
devm_drm_of_get_bridge() ends up) and drm_kms_helper (where
devm_drm_panel_bridge_add() is).
Fix this by moving devm_drm_of_get_bridge() to bridge/panel.c and thus
drm_kms_helper.
Fixes: 87ea95808d ("drm/bridge: Add a function to abstract away panels")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210917180925.2602266-1-maxime@cerno.tech
Commit ebd8cbf1fb ("drm/panel: s6d27a1: Add driver for Samsung S6D27A1
display panel") introduces a new section DRM DRIVER FOR SAMSUNG S6D27A1
PANELS with a minor typo in one of its file entries.
Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --self-test=patterns complains:
warning: no file matches F: driver/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-s6d27a1.c
So, repair the entry and make get_maintainer.pl happy.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210921122146.13132-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
This symbol is not used outside of dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c, so marks
it static.
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c:646:13: warning: symbol
'hstt_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1628218664-14230-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Clean up the following includecheck warning:
./drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c: linux/phy/phy.h is
included more than once.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Fixes: 71f68fe7f1 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: add ability to work as a phy instead of full dsi")
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1629454729-108701-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Commit a25b988ff8 ("drm/bridge: Extend bridge API to disable connector creation")
added DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR bridge flag and all bridges handle
this flag in some way since then.
Newly added bridge drivers must no longer contain the connector creation and
will fail probing if this flag isn't set.
In order to be able to connect to those newly added bridges as well,
make use of drm_bridge_connector API and have the connector initialized
by the display controller.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210913125108.195704-1-knaerzche@gmail.com
As discussed at [1] rockchip_drm_endpoint_is_subdriver will currently always
return -ENODEV for non-platform-devices (e.g. external i2c bridges), what
makes them never being considered in rockchip_rgb_init.
As suggested at [1] this additionally adds a of_device_is_available for
the node found, which will work for both platform and non-platform devices.
Also we can return early for non-platform-devices if they are enabled,
as rockchip_sub_drivers contains exclusively platform-devices.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210316182753.GA25685@earth.li/
Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914150756.85190-1-knaerzche@gmail.com
As discussed in the patch ("dt-bindings: drm/panel-simple: Introduce
generic eDP panels") we can actually support probing eDP panels at
runtime instead of hardcoding what panel is connected. Add support to
the panel-edp driver for this.
We'll implement a solution like this:
* We'll read in two delays from the device tree that are used for
powering up the panel the initial time (to read the EDID).
* In the EDID we can find a 32-bit ID that identifies what panel we've
found. From this ID we can look up the full set of delays.
After this change we'll still need to add per-panel delays into the
panel-simple driver but we will no longer need to specify exactly
which panel is connected to which board in the device tree. Nicely,
any panels that are only supported this way also don't need to
hardcode mode data since it's guaranteed that we can get that through
the EDID.
This patch will seed the ID-to-delay table with a few panels that I
have access to, many of which are on sc7180-trogdor devices.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.15.Id9c96cba4eba3e5ee519bfb09cd64b39f2490293@changeid
While cleaning up the descriptions of the delay for eDP panels I
realized that we'd have a bug if any panels need the
"prepare_to_enable" but HPD handling isn't happening in the panel
driver. Let's put in a stopgap to at least make us not violate
timings. This is not perfectly optimal but trying to do better is
hard. At the moment only 2 panels specify this delay and only 30 ms is
at stake. These panels are also currently hooked up with "hpd-gpios"
so effectively this "fix" is just a theoretical fix and won't actually
do anything for any devices currently supported in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.13.Ia8288d36df4b12770af59ae3ff73ef7e08fb4e2e@changeid
Now that the delays are named / described with eDP-centric names, it
becomes clear that we should really specify the "hpd_reliable" and
"hpd_absent" separately without taking the other into account. Let's
fix it.
This should be a no-op change and just adjust how we specify
things. The actual delays should be the same before and after for the
one panel that currently species both "hpd_reliable" and "hpd_absent".
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.12.I2522235fca3aa6790ede0bf22a93d79a1f694e6b@changeid
Now that the eDP panel driver only handles eDP panels we can make
better sense of the delays here. Let's describe them in terms of the
standard eDP timing diagram from the eDP spec.
As part of this, it becomes pretty clear that some eDP panels have too
long of a "hpd_reliable_delay". This used to be the "prepare"
delay. It's the fixed delay that we do in the panel driver after
powering on our panel before we look at the HPD signal. To understand
this better, first realize that there could be 3 paths we follow
depending on how HPD is hooked up. Let's walk through them:
1. HPD is handled by the eDP controller driver. Until "recently"
(commit 48834e6084 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for
delaying prepare()") in May 2020) this was the only supported
way. This is supposed to be when the controller driver gets HPD
straight to a dedicated pin. In this case the controller driver
should be waiting for HPD in its pre_enable() routine which should
be called right after the panel's prepare() function is
called. That means that the old "prepare" delay was only needed as
a delay after powering the panel but before looking at HPD.
2. HPD is handled via hpd-gpios in the panel. This is much like #1 but
much easier to follow since all the handling is in the panel
driver.
3. The no-hpd case. This is also easy to follow.
In any case, even though it seems like some old panel data was using
this incorrectly, let's not touch the old data structures but we'll
add a note indicating that something seems off.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.11.I2d798dd015332661c5895ef744bc8ec5cd2e06ca@changeid
In the case where we can read an EDID for a panel the only part of the
panel description that can't be found directly from the EDID is the
description of the delays. Let's break the delay structure out so that
we can specify just the delays for panels that are detected by EDID.
This is simple code motion. No functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.10.I24f3646dd09954958645cc05c538909f169bf362@changeid
All of the "HPD" handling added to panel-simple recently was for eDP
panels. Remove it from panel-simple now that panel-edp handles eDP
panels. The "prepare_to_enable" delay only makes sense in the context
of HPD, so remove it too. No non-eDP panels used it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.9.I77d7a48df0a6585ef2cc2ff140fbe8f236a9a9f7@changeid
Not all panels in panel-simple were marked what type of panel they
were. I searched through ARM/ARM64 Chromebooks or Chromebook-related
reference boards that I was aware of and found some panels that needed
to be moved. I also skimmed for panels that had no mode and were "big"
since it's quite rare to see a small eDP panel. Here's what I found:
* auo,b101ean01 - rk3288-veyron-minnie
* auo,b133htn01 - exynos5800-peach-pi
* auo,b133xtn01 - tegra124-nyan-big
* boe,nv101wxmn51 - rk3399-gru-bob
* innolux,p120zdg-bf1 - sdm845-cheza
* lg,lp079qx1-sp0v - rk3399-evb and similar
* lg,lp097qx1-spa1 - According to commit 0355dde26e ("drm/panel:
simple: Add support for LG LP097QX1-SPA1 panel") this is an eDP
panel.
* lg,lp129qe - tegra124-venice2
* samsung,lsn122dl01-c01 - According to commit 0330eaf390
("drm/panel: simple: Add support for Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 panel")
this is an eDP panel.
* samsung,ltn140at29-301 - tegra124-nyan-blaze
* sharp,ld-d5116z01b - According to commit cd5e1cbe1f ("drm/panel:
simple: Add support for Sharp LD-D5116Z01B panel") this is an eDP
panel.
* sharp,lq123p1jx31 - rk3399-gru-kevin
* starry,kr122ea0sra - rk3399-gru-gru (reference board, not upstream)
I won't promise that I didn't miss a single panel, but that's fairly
complete I think.
I'm not sure the full impact of the fact that they didn't have the
connector type specified, but at least as of commit 9f069c6fbc
("drm/panel: panel-simple: add default connector_type") we may have
been accidentally thinking of them as DPI panels. We also would
certainly have had a warning. In any case since we don't want to
support anything eDP in the old simple-panel driver, we should move
these.
Cc: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.8.I84e36f9f86d5d693fce0641a55ddb264a518a947@changeid
The panel-simple driver handles way too much. Let's start trying to
get a handle on it by splitting out the eDP panels. This patch does
this:
1. Start by copying simple-panel verbatim over to a new driver,
simple-panel-edp.
2. Rename "panel_simple" to "panel_edp" in the new driver.
3. Keep only panels marked with `DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP` in the new
driver. Remove those panels from the old driver.
4. Remove all recent "DP AUX bus" stuff from the old driver. The DP
AUX bus is only possible on DP panels.
5. Remove all DSI / MIPI related functions from the new driver.
6. Remove bus_format / bus_flags from eDP driver. These things don't
seem to make any sense for eDP panels so let's stop filling in made
up stuff.
In the end we end up with a bunch of duplicated code for now. Future
patches will try to address _some_ of this duplicated code though some
of it will be unavoidable.
NOTE: This may not actually move all eDP panels over to the new driver
since not all panels were properly marked with
`DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP`. A future patch will attempt to move wayward
panels I could identify but even so there may be some missed.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.7.I0a2f75bb822d17ce06f5b147734764eeb0c3e3df@changeid
In the patch ("drm/panel-simple-edp: Split eDP panels out of
panel-simple") we will split the PANEL_SIMPLE driver in two. By
default let's give everyone who had the old driver enabled the new
driver too. If folks want to opt-out of one or the other they always
can later.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.5.I02250cd7d4799661b068bcc65849a456ed411734@changeid
In the patch ("drm/edid: Allow the querying/working with the panel ID
from the EDID") we introduced a different way of working with the
panel ID stored in the EDID. Let's use this new way for the quirks
code.
Advantages of the new style:
* Smaller data structure size. Saves 4 bytes per panel.
* Iterate through quirks structure with just "==" instead of strncmp()
* In-kernel storage is more similar to what's stored in the EDID
itself making it easier to grok that they are referring to the same
value.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.4.I6103ce2b16e5e5a842b14c7022a034712b434609@changeid
EDIDs have 32-bits worth of data which is intended to be used to
uniquely identify the make/model of a panel. This has historically
been used only internally in the EDID processing code to identify
quirks with panels.
We'd like to use this panel ID in panel drivers to identify which
panel is hooked up and from that information figure out power sequence
timings. Let's expose this information from the EDID code and also
allow it to be accessed early, before a connector has been created.
To make matching in the panel drivers code easier, we'll return the
panel ID as a 32-bit value. We'll provide some functions for
converting this value back and forth to something more human readable.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.3.I4a672175ba1894294d91d3dbd51da11a8239cf4a@changeid
A future change wants to be able to read just block 0 of the EDID, so
break it out of drm_do_get_edid() into a sub-function.
This is intended to be a no-op change--just code movement.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.2.I62e76a034ac78c994d40a23cd4ec5aeee56fa77c@changeid
eDP panels generally contain almost everything needed to control them
in their EDID. This comes from their DP heritage were a computer needs
to be able to properly control pretty much any DP display that's
plugged into it.
The one big issue with eDP panels and the reason that we need a panel
driver for them is that the power sequencing can be different per
panel.
While it is true that eDP panel sequencing can be arbitrarily complex,
in practice it turns out that many eDP panels are compatible with just
some slightly different delays. See the contents of the bindings file
introduced in this patch for some details.
The fact that eDP panels are 99% probable and that the power
sequencing (especially power up) can be compatible between many panels
means that there's a constant desire to plug multiple different panels
into the same board. This could be for second sourcing purposes or to
support multiple SKUs (maybe a 11" and a 13", for instance).
As discussed [1], it should be OK to support this by adding two
properties to the device tree to specify the delays needed for
powering up the panel the first time. We'll create a new "edp-panel"
bindings file and define the two delays that might need to be
specified. NOTE: in the vast majority of the cases (HPD is hooked up
and isn't glitchy or is debounced) even these delays aren't needed.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=VZYOMPwQZzWdhJGh5cjJWw_EcM-wQVEivZ-bdGXjPrEQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.1.I1116e79d34035338a45c1fc7cdd14a097909c8e0@changeid
