Currently, IO priority set in task's IO context is not reflected in the
bio->bi_ioprio for most IO (only io_uring and direct IO set it). This
results in odd results where process is submitting some bios with one
priority and other bios with a different (unset) priority and due to
differing priorities bios cannot be merged. Make sure bio->bi_ioprio is
always set on bio submission.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-9-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Bio's IO priority needs to be initialized before we try to merge the bio
with other bios. Otherwise we could merge bios which would otherwise
receive different IO priorities leading to possible QoS issues.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-8-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Convert blk-ioprio handling from a rqos policy to a direct call from
blk_mq_submit_bio(). Firstly, blk-ioprio is not much of a rqos policy
anyway, it just needs a hook in bio submission path to set the bio's IO
priority. Secondly, the rqos .track hook gets actually called too late
for blk-ioprio purposes and introducing a special rqos hook just for
blk-ioprio looks even weirder.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
blkcg->ioprio_set field is not really useful except for avoiding
possibly more expensive checks inside blkcg_ioprio_track(). The check
for blkcg->prio_policy being equal to POLICY_NO_CHANGE does the same
service so just remove the ioprio_set field and replace the check.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-6-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
ioprio_get(2) can be asked to return the best IO priority from several
tasks (IOPRIO_WHO_PGRP, IOPRIO_WHO_USER). Currently the call treats
tasks without set IO priority as having priority
IOPRIO_CLASS_BE/IOPRIO_BE_NORM however this does not really reflect the
IO priority the task will get (which depends on task's nice value).
Fix the code to use the real IO priority task's IO will use. We have to
modify code for ioprio_get(IOPRIO_WHO_PROCESS) to keep returning
IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE priority for tasks without set IO priority as a
special case to maintain userspace visible API.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-5-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Nobody outside of block/ioprio.c uses it.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
get_current_ioprio() operates only on current task. We will need the
same functionality for other tasks as well. Generalize
get_current_ioprio() for that and also move the bulk out of the header
file because it is large enough.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
get_current_ioprio() is used to initialize IO priority of various
requests. As such it should be returning the effective IO priority of
the task (i.e., reflecting the fact that unset IO priority should get
set based on task's CPU priority) so that the conversion is concentrated
in one place.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Commit e70344c059 ("block: fix default IO priority handling")
introduced an inconsistency in get_current_ioprio() that tasks without
IO context return IOPRIO_DEFAULT priority while tasks with freshly
allocated IO context will return 0 (IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE/0) IO priority.
Tasks without IO context used to be rare before 5a9d041ba2 ("block:
move io_context creation into where it's needed") but after this commit
they became common because now only BFQ IO scheduler setups task's IO
context. Similar inconsistency is there for get_task_ioprio() so this
inconsistency is now exposed to userspace and userspace will see
different IO priority for tasks operating on devices with BFQ compared
to devices without BFQ. Furthemore the changes done by commit
e70344c059 change the behavior when no IO priority is set for BFQ IO
scheduler which is also documented in ioprio_set(2) manpage:
"If no I/O scheduler has been set for a thread, then by default the I/O
priority will follow the CPU nice value (setpriority(2)). In Linux
kernels before version 2.6.24, once an I/O priority had been set using
ioprio_set(), there was no way to reset the I/O scheduling behavior to
the default. Since Linux 2.6.24, specifying ioprio as 0 can be used to
reset to the default I/O scheduling behavior."
So make sure we default to IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE as used to be the case
before commit e70344c059. Also cleanup alloc_io_context() to
explicitely set this IO priority for the allocated IO context to avoid
future surprises. Note that we tweak ioprio_best() to maintain
ioprio_get(2) behavior and make this commit easily backportable.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e70344c059 ("block: fix default IO priority handling")
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Tested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623074840.5960-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() disables preemption to get a stable
current CPU number and then invokes __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() if the CPU
number is part the mask.
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue() acquires a spin_lock_t which is a sleeping lock
on PREEMPT_RT and can't be acquired with disabled preemption.
It is not required for correctness to invoke __blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on
a CPU matching hctx->cpumask. Both (async and direct requests) can run
on a CPU not matching hctx->cpumask.
The CPU mask without disabling preemption and invoking
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YrLSEiNvagKJaDs5@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Fix the following warnings:
block/bfq-cgroup.c:721: warning: Function parameter or member 'bfqg' not described in '__bfq_bic_change_cgroup'
block/bfq-cgroup.c:721: warning: Excess function parameter 'blkcg' description in '__bfq_bic_change_cgroup'
block/bfq-cgroup.c:870: warning: Function parameter or member 'ioprio_class' not described in 'bfq_reparent_leaf_entity'
block/bfq-cgroup.c:900: warning: Function parameter or member 'ioprio_class' not described in 'bfq_reparent_active_queues'
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220617210859.106623-1-bvanassche@acm.org
blk_queue_get_max_sectors is private to the block layer, so move it out
of blkdev.h.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-7-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Now that blk_max_size_offset has a single caller left, fold it into that
and clean up the naming convention for the local variables there.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-6-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
get_max_io_size has a very odd choice of variables names and
initialization patterns. Switch to more descriptive names and more
clear initialization of them.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-5-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
blk_rq_get_max_sectors always uses q->limits.chunk_sectors as the
chunk_sectors argument, and already checks for max_sectors through the
call to blk_queue_get_max_sectors. That means much of
blk_max_size_offset is not needed and open coding it simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-4-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
max_io_len always passes an explicitly non-zero chunk_sectors into
blk_max_size_offset. That means much of blk_max_size_offset is not
needed and can be open coded to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Factor out a helper from blk_max_size_offset so that it can be reused
independently.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090934.570632-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Since the introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() the operation type in
the second argument of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() matters. The introduction
of blk_mq_get_hctx_type() caused blk_mq_get_sq_hctx() to select a
hardware queue of type HCTX_TYPE_READ instead of HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT.
Switch to hardware queue type HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT since HCTX_TYPE_READ
should only be used for read requests.
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615225549.1054905-4-bvanassche@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Before the introduction of blk_mq_get_hctx_type(), blk_mq_map_queue()
only used the flags from its second argument. Since the introduction of
blk_mq_get_hctx_type(), blk_mq_map_queue() uses both the operation and
the flags encoded in that argument. Rename the second argument of
blk_mq_map_queue() to make this clear.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615225549.1054905-3-bvanassche@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Use ida_alloc()/ida_free() instead of
ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove().
The latter is deprecated and more verbose.
Signed-off-by: Bo Liu <liubo03@inspur.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615081816.4342-1-liubo03@inspur.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Use the address alignment requirements from the block_device for direct
io instead of requiring addresses be aligned to the block size.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-12-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Use the address alignment requirements from the block_device for direct
io instead of requiring addresses be aligned to the block size. User
space can discover the alignment requirements from the dma_alignment
queue attribute.
User space can specify any hardware compatible DMA offset for each
segment, but every segment length is still required to be a multiple of
the block size.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-11-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Provide a convenient function for this repeatable coding pattern.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-10-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The existing iov_iter_alignment() function returns the logical OR of
address and length. For cases where address and length need to be
considered separately, introduce a helper function that a caller can
specificy length and address masks that indicate if the iov is
unaligned.
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-9-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Individual bv_len's may not be a sector size.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-8-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Individual bv_len's may not be a sector size.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-7-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This will make it easier to add more complex acceptable alignment
criteria in the future.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-6-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Preparing for upcoming dma_alignment users that have a block_device, but
don't need the request_queue.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-5-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
User space may want to know how to align their buffers to avoid
bouncing. Export the queue attribute.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-4-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The getting pages setup for zone append and normal IO are identical. Use
common code for each.
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-3-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Returning 0 early from __bio_iov_append_get_pages() for the
max_append_sectors warning just creates an infinite loop since 0 means
success, and the bio will never fill from the unadvancing iov_iter. We
could turn the return into an error value, but it will already be turned
into an error value later on, so just remove the warning. Clearly no one
ever hit it anyway.
Fixes: 0512a75b98 ("block: Introduce REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND")
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610195830.3574005-2-kbusch@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
There are only a few drivers that do not call
spi_finalize_current_message() in the context of transfer_one_message(),
and even for those cases the completion ctlr->cur_msg_completion is not
needed always. The calls to complete() and wait_for_completion() each
take a spin-lock, which is costly. This patch makes it possible to avoid
those calls in the big majority of cases, by introducing two flags that
with the help of ordering via barriers can avoid using the completion
safely. In case of a race with the context calling
spi_finalize_current_message(), the scheme errs on the safe side and takes
the completion.
The impact of this patch is worth the effort: On a i.MX8MM SoC, the time
the SPI bus is idle between two consecutive calls to spi_sync(), is
reduced from 19.6us to 16.8us... roughly 15%.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-12-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This patch introduces a completion that is completed in
spi_finalize_current_message() and waited for in
__spi_pump_transfer_message(). This way all manipulation of ctlr->cur_msg
is done with the io_mutex held and strictly ordered:
__spi_pump_transfer_message() will not return until
spi_finalize_current_message() is done using ctlr->cur_msg, and its
calling context is only touching ctlr->cur_msg after returning.
Due to this, we can safely drop the spin-locks around ctlr->cur_msg.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-11-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Since the whole idling transition is locked by the io_mutex now, there is
no need to check this flag anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-7-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Now that the idling flag is wholly behind the io_mutex, this broken piece
of code can be safely removed.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-6-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The interaction with the controller message queue and its corresponding
auxiliary flags and variables requires the use of the queue_lock which is
costly. Since spi_sync will transfer the complete message anyway, and not
return until it is finished, there is no need to put the message into the
queue if the queue is empty. This can save a lot of overhead.
As an example of how significant this is, when using the MCP2518FD SPI CAN
controller on a i.MX8MM SoC, the time during which the interrupt line
stays active (during 3 relatively short spi_sync messages), is reduced
from 98us to 72us by this patch.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-3-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This enables the possibility to transfer a message that is not at the
current tip of the async message queue.
This is in preparation of the next patch(es) which enable spi_sync messages
to skip the queue altogether.
Signed-off-by: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621061234.3626638-2-david@protonic.nl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We deprecated open coding of the transfer queue back in 2017 so it's high
time we finished up converting drivers to use the standard message queue
code. The mpc52xx-psc driver is fairly straightforward so convert to use
transfer_one_message(), it looks like the driver would be a good fit for
transfer_one() with a little bit of updating but this smaller change seems
safer.
The driver seems like a good candidate for transfer_one() but the chip
select function is actually doing rather more than just updating the chip
select and both transfer_one() and transfer_one_message() are current APIs
so leave that refactoring for another day, ideally by someone with the
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220613121946.136193-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We deprecated open coding of the transfer queue back in 2017 so it's high
time we finished up converting drivers to use the standard message queue
code. The SH driver is fairly straightforward so convert to use
transfer_one_message(), it looks like the driver would be a good fit for
transfer_one() with a little bit of updating but this smaller change seems
safer.
I'm not actually clear how the driver worked robustly previously, it
clears SSA and CR1 when queueing a transfer which looks like it would
interfere with any running transfer. This clearing has been moved to the
start of the message transfer function.
I'm also unclear how exactly the chip select is managed with this driver.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610154649.1707851-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Document samsung,exynos4210-spi compatible which is already used on
several Exynos SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220626112838.19281-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Currently if the source DMA device isn't ready to provide the channels
capable of the SPI DMA transfers, the DW SSI controller will be registered
with no DMA support. It isn't right since all what the driver needs to do
is to postpone the probe procedure until the DMA device is ready. Let's
fix that in the framework of the DWC SSI generic DMA implementation. First
we need to use the dma_request_chan() method instead of the
dma_request_slave_channel() function, because the later one is deprecated
and most importantly doesn't return the failure cause but the
NULL-pointer. Second we need to stop the DW SSI controller probe procedure
if the -EPROBE_DEFER error is returned on the DMA initialization. The
procedure will resume later when the channels are ready to be requested.
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624210623.6383-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
