Since all the primitive elements used for the notification done by ipmr
are now common [mr_table, mr_mfc, vif_device] we can refactor the logic
for dumping them to a common file.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Like vif notifications, move the notifier struct for MFC as well as its
helpers into a common file; Currently they're only used by ipmr.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The fib-notifiers are tightly coupled with the vif_device which is
already common. Move the notifier struct definition and helpers to the
common file; Currently they're only used by ipmr.
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It's required to create a modules.alias via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE helper
for the OF platform driver. Otherwise, module autoloading cannot work.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
MODULE_ALIAS exports information to allow the module to be auto-loaded at
boot for the drivers registered using legacy platform registration.
However, currently the driver is always used by DT-only platform,
MODULE_ALIAS is redundant and should be removed properly.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Kirill Tkhai says:
====================
Converting pernet_operations (part #7.1)
this is a resending of the 4 patches from path #7.
Anna kindly reviewed them and suggested to take the patches
through net tree, since there is pernet_operations::async only
in net-next.git.
There is Anna's acks on every header, the rest of patch
has no changes.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These pernet_operations create and destroy per-net pipe
and dentry, and they seem safe to be marked as async.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These pernet_operations look similar to rpcsec_gss_net_ops,
they just create and destroy another cache. Also they create
and destroy directory. So, they also look safe to be async.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These pernet_operations look similar to rpcsec_gss_net_ops,
they just create and destroy another caches. So, they also
can be async.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
These pernet_operations initialize and destroy sunrpc_net_id
refered per-net items. Only used global list is cache_list,
and accesses already serialized.
sunrpc_destroy_cache_detail() check for list_empty() without
cache_list_lock, but when it's called from unregister_pernet_subsys(),
there can't be callers in parallel, so we won't miss list_empty()
in this case.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some variants of the Arm Cortex-55 cores (r0p0, r0p1, r1p0) suffer
from an erratum 1024718, which causes incorrect updates when DBM/AP
bits in a page table entry is modified without a break-before-make
sequence. The work around is to skip enabling the hardware DBM feature
on the affected cores. The hardware Access Flag management features
is not affected. There are some other cores suffering from this
errata, which could be added to the midr_list to trigger the work
around.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: ckadabi@codeaurora.org
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We enable hardware DBM bit in a capable CPU, very early in the
boot via __cpu_setup. This doesn't give us a flexibility of
optionally disable the feature, as the clearing the bit
is a bit costly as the TLB can cache the settings. Instead,
we delay enabling the feature until the CPU is brought up
into the kernel. We use the feature capability mechanism
to handle it.
The hardware DBM is a non-conflicting feature. i.e, the kernel
can safely run with a mix of CPUs with some using the feature
and the others don't. So, it is safe for a late CPU to have
this capability and enable it, even if the active CPUs don't.
To get this handled properly by the infrastructure, we
unconditionally set the capability and only enable it
on CPUs which really have the feature. Also, we print the
feature detection from the "matches" call back to make sure
we don't mislead the user when none of the CPUs could use the
feature.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Update the MIDR encodings for the Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Some capabilities have different criteria for detection and associated
actions based on the matching criteria, even though they all share the
same capability bit. So far we have used multiple entries with the same
capability bit to handle this. This is prone to errors, as the
cpu_enable is invoked for each entry, irrespective of whether the
detection rule applies to the CPU or not. And also this complicates
other helpers, e.g, __this_cpu_has_cap.
This patch adds a wrapper entry to cover all the possible variations
of a capability by maintaining list of matches + cpu_enable callbacks.
To avoid complicating the prototypes for the "matches()", we use
arm64_cpu_capabilities maintain the list and we ignore all the other
fields except the matches & cpu_enable.
This ensures :
1) The capabilitiy is set when at least one of the entry detects
2) Action is only taken for the entries that "matches".
This avoids explicit checks in the cpu_enable() take some action.
The only constraint here is that, all the entries should have the
same "type" (i.e, scope and conflict rules).
If a cpu_enable() method is associated with multiple matches for a
single capability, care should be taken that either the match criteria
are mutually exclusive, or that the method is robust against being
called multiple times.
This also reverts the changes introduced by commit 67948af41f
("arm64: capabilities: Handle duplicate entries for a capability").
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Add helpers for detecting an errata on list of midr ranges
of affected CPUs, with the same work around.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Add helpers for checking if the given CPU midr falls in a range
of variants/revisions for a given model.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We are about to introduce generic MIDR range helpers. Clean
up the existing helpers in erratum handling, preparing them
to use generic version.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We expect all CPUs to be running at the same EL inside the kernel
with or without VHE enabled and we have strict checks to ensure
that any mismatch triggers a kernel panic. If VHE is enabled,
we use the feature based on the boot CPU and all other CPUs
should follow. This makes it a perfect candidate for a capability
based on the boot CPU, which should be matched by all the CPUs
(both when is ON and OFF). This saves us some not-so-pretty
hooks and special code, just for verifying the conflict.
The patch also makes the VHE capability entry depend on
CONFIG_ARM64_VHE.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
The kernel detects and uses some of the features based on the boot
CPU and expects that all the following CPUs conform to it. e.g,
with VHE and the boot CPU running at EL2, the kernel decides to
keep the kernel running at EL2. If another CPU is brought up without
this capability, we use custom hooks (via check_early_cpu_features())
to handle it. To handle such capabilities add support for detecting
and enabling capabilities based on the boot CPU.
A bit is added to indicate if the capability should be detected
early on the boot CPU. The infrastructure then ensures that such
capabilities are probed and "enabled" early on in the boot CPU
and, enabled on the subsequent CPUs.
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
KPTI is treated as a system wide feature and is only detected if all
the CPUs in the sysetm needs the defense, unless it is forced via kernel
command line. This leaves a system with a mix of CPUs with and without
the defense vulnerable. Also, if a late CPU needs KPTI but KPTI was not
activated at boot time, the CPU is currently allowed to boot, which is a
potential security vulnerability.
This patch ensures that the KPTI is turned on if at least one CPU detects
the capability (i.e, change scope to SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU). Also rejetcs a late
CPU, if it requires the defense, when the system hasn't enabled it,
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Now that we have the flexibility of defining system features based
on individual CPUs, introduce CPU feature type that can be detected
on a local SCOPE and ignores the conflict on late CPUs. This is
applicable for ARM64_HAS_NO_HW_PREFETCH, where it is fine for
the system to have CPUs without hardware prefetch turning up
later. We only suffer a performance penalty, nothing fatal.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Now that the features and errata workarounds have the same
rules and flow, group the handling of the tables.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
So far we have treated the feature capabilities as system wide
and this wouldn't help with features that could be detected locally
on one or more CPUs (e.g, KPTI, Software prefetch). This patch
splits the feature detection to two phases :
1) Local CPU features are checked on all boot time active CPUs.
2) System wide features are checked only once after all CPUs are
active.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Right now we run through the errata workarounds check on all boot
active CPUs, with SCOPE_ALL. This wouldn't help for detecting erratum
workarounds with a SYSTEM_SCOPE. There are none yet, but we plan to
introduce some: let us clean this up so that such workarounds can be
detected and enabled correctly.
So, we run the checks with SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU on all CPUs and SCOPE_SYSTEM
checks are run only once after all the boot time CPUs are active.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We are about to group the handling of all capabilities (features
and errata workarounds). This patch open codes the wrapper routines
to make it easier to merge the handling.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
While processing the list of capabilities, it is useful to
filter out some of the entries based on the given mask for the
scope of the capabilities to allow better control. This can be
used later for handling LOCAL vs SYSTEM wide capabilities and more.
All capabilities should have their scope set to either LOCAL_CPU or
SYSTEM. No functional/flow change.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Now that each capability describes how to treat the conflicts
of CPU cap state vs System wide cap state, we can unify the
verification logic to a single place.
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
When a CPU is brought up, it is checked against the caps that are
known to be enabled on the system (via verify_local_cpu_capabilities()).
Based on the state of the capability on the CPU vs. that of System we
could have the following combinations of conflict.
x-----------------------------x
| Type | System | Late CPU |
|-----------------------------|
| a | y | n |
|-----------------------------|
| b | n | y |
x-----------------------------x
Case (a) is not permitted for caps which are system features, which the
system expects all the CPUs to have (e.g VHE). While (a) is ignored for
all errata work arounds. However, there could be exceptions to the plain
filtering approach. e.g, KPTI is an optional feature for a late CPU as
long as the system already enables it.
Case (b) is not permitted for errata work arounds that cannot be activated
after the kernel has finished booting.And we ignore (b) for features. Here,
yet again, KPTI is an exception, where if a late CPU needs KPTI we are too
late to enable it (because we change the allocation of ASIDs etc).
Add two different flags to indicate how the conflict should be handled.
ARM64_CPUCAP_PERMITTED_FOR_LATE_CPU - CPUs may have the capability
ARM64_CPUCAP_OPTIONAL_FOR_LATE_CPU - CPUs may not have the cappability.
Now that we have the flags to describe the behavior of the errata and
the features, as we treat them, define types for ERRATUM and FEATURE.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We use arm64_cpu_capabilities to represent CPU ELF HWCAPs exposed
to the userspace and the CPU hwcaps used by the kernel, which
include cpu features and CPU errata work arounds. Capabilities
have some properties that decide how they should be treated :
1) Detection, i.e scope : A cap could be "detected" either :
- if it is present on at least one CPU (SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)
Or
- if it is present on all the CPUs (SCOPE_SYSTEM)
2) When is it enabled ? - A cap is treated as "enabled" when the
system takes some action based on whether the capability is detected or
not. e.g, setting some control register, patching the kernel code.
Right now, we treat all caps are enabled at boot-time, after all
the CPUs are brought up by the kernel. But there are certain caps,
which are enabled early during the boot (e.g, VHE, GIC_CPUIF for NMI)
and kernel starts using them, even before the secondary CPUs are brought
up. We would need a way to describe this for each capability.
3) Conflict on a late CPU - When a CPU is brought up, it is checked
against the caps that are known to be enabled on the system (via
verify_local_cpu_capabilities()). Based on the state of the capability
on the CPU vs. that of System we could have the following combinations
of conflict.
x-----------------------------x
| Type | System | Late CPU |
------------------------------|
| a | y | n |
------------------------------|
| b | n | y |
x-----------------------------x
Case (a) is not permitted for caps which are system features, which the
system expects all the CPUs to have (e.g VHE). While (a) is ignored for
all errata work arounds. However, there could be exceptions to the plain
filtering approach. e.g, KPTI is an optional feature for a late CPU as
long as the system already enables it.
Case (b) is not permitted for errata work arounds which requires some
work around, which cannot be delayed. And we ignore (b) for features.
Here, yet again, KPTI is an exception, where if a late CPU needs KPTI we
are too late to enable it (because we change the allocation of ASIDs
etc).
So this calls for a lot more fine grained behavior for each capability.
And if we define all the attributes to control their behavior properly,
we may be able to use a single table for the CPU hwcaps (which cover
errata and features, not the ELF HWCAPs). This is a prepartory step
to get there. More bits would be added for the properties listed above.
We are going to use a bit-mask to encode all the properties of a
capabilities. This patch encodes the "SCOPE" of the capability.
As such there is no change in how the capabilities are treated.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We have errata work around processing code in cpu_errata.c,
which calls back into helpers defined in cpufeature.c. Now
that we are going to make the handling of capabilities
generic, by adding the information to each capability,
move the errata work around specific processing code.
No functional changes.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
We trigger CPU errata work around check on the boot CPU from
smp_prepare_boot_cpu() to make sure that we run the checks only
after the CPU feature infrastructure is initialised. While this
is correct, we can also do this from init_cpu_features() which
initilises the infrastructure, and is called only on the
Boot CPU. This helps to consolidate the CPU capability handling
to cpufeature.c. No functional changes.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren says:
====================
nfp: flower: add ip fragmentation offloading support
This set allows offloading IP fragmentation classification. It Implements
ip fragmentation match offloading for both IPv4 and IPv6 and offloads
frag, nofrag, first and nofirstfrag classification.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Implement ip fragmentation match offloading for both IPv4 and IPv6. Allows
offloading frag, nofrag, first and nofirstfrag classification.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Refactored shared ip header code for IPv4 and IPv6 in match offload.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We issue the enable() call back for all CPU hwcaps capabilities
available on the system, on all the CPUs. So far we have ignored
the argument passed to the call back, which had a prototype to
accept a "void *" for use with on_each_cpu() and later with
stop_machine(). However, with commit 0a0d111d40
("arm64: cpufeature: Pass capability structure to ->enable callback"),
there are some users of the argument who wants the matching capability
struct pointer where there are multiple matching criteria for a single
capability. Clean up the declaration of the call back to make it clear.
1) Renamed to cpu_enable(), to imply taking necessary actions on the
called CPU for the entry.
2) Pass const pointer to the capability, to allow the call back to
check the entry. (e.,g to check if any action is needed on the CPU)
3) We don't care about the result of the call back, turning this to
a void.
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
[suzuki: convert more users, rename call back and drop results]
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
This patch implements multiple pieces of the initialization flow
as follows:
1) A reset is issued to ensure a clean device state, followed
by initialization of admin queue interface.
2) Once the admin queue interface is up, clear the PF config
and transition the device to non-PXE mode.
3) Get the NVM configuration stored in the device's non-volatile
memory (NVM) using ice_init_nvm.
CC: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
We try to hold TX virtqueue mutex in vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len()
after RX virtqueue mutex is held in handle_rx(). This requires an
appropriate lock nesting notation to calm down deadlock detector.
Fixes: 0308813724 ("vhost_net: basic polling support")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f073540b1384a614e09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is needed to support the modem found in HP EliteBook 820 G3.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The same fix as in 'bonding: move dev_mc_sync after master_upper_dev_link
in bond_enslave' is needed for team driver.
The panic can be reproduced easily:
ip link add team1 type team
ip link set team1 up
ip link add link team1 vlan1 type vlan id 80
ip link set vlan1 master team1
Fixes: cb41c997d4 ("team: team should sync the port's uc/mc addrs when add a port")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Xin Long says:
====================
bonding: a bunch of fixes for dev hwaddr sync in bond_enslave
This patchset is mainly to fix a crash when adding vlan as slave of
bond which is also the parent link in patch 2/3, and also fix some
err process problems in bond_enslave in patch 1/3 and 3/3.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When dev_set_promiscuity(1) succeeds but dev_set_allmulti(1) fails,
dev_set_promiscuity(-1) should be done before going to the err path.
Otherwise, dev->promiscuity will leak.
Fixes: 7e1a1ac1fb ("bonding: Check return of dev_set_promiscuity/allmulti")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Beniamino found a crash when adding vlan as slave of bond which is also
the parent link:
ip link add bond1 type bond
ip link set bond1 up
ip link add link bond1 vlan1 type vlan id 80
ip link set vlan1 master bond1
The call trace is as below:
[<ffffffffa850842a>] queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0xb/0xf
[<ffffffffa8515680>] _raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffffa83f6f07>] dev_mc_sync+0x37/0x80
[<ffffffffc08687dc>] vlan_dev_set_rx_mode+0x1c/0x30 [8021q]
[<ffffffffa83efd2a>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x5a/0xa0
[<ffffffffa83f7138>] dev_mc_sync_multiple+0x78/0x80
[<ffffffffc084127c>] bond_enslave+0x67c/0x1190 [bonding]
[<ffffffffa8401909>] do_setlink+0x9c9/0xe50
[<ffffffffa8403bf2>] rtnl_newlink+0x522/0x880
[<ffffffffa8403ff7>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0xa7/0x260
[<ffffffffa8424ecb>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xab/0xc0
[<ffffffffa83fe498>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x30
[<ffffffffa8424850>] netlink_unicast+0x170/0x210
[<ffffffffa8424bf8>] netlink_sendmsg+0x308/0x420
[<ffffffffa83cc396>] sock_sendmsg+0xb6/0xf0
This is actually a dead lock caused by sync slave hwaddr from master when
the master is the slave's 'slave'. This dead loop check is actually done
by netdev_master_upper_dev_link. However, Commit 1f718f0f4f ("bonding:
populate neighbour's private on enslave") moved it after dev_mc_sync.
This patch is to fix it by moving dev_mc_sync after master_upper_dev_link,
so that this loop check would be earlier than dev_mc_sync. It also moves
if (mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD) into if (!bond_uses_primary) clause as an
improvement.
Note team driver also has this issue, I will fix it in another patch.
Fixes: 1f718f0f4f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave")
Reported-by: Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
vlan_vids_add_by_dev is called right after dev hwaddr sync, so on
the err path it should unsync dev hwaddr. Otherwise, the slave
dev's hwaddr will never be unsync when this err happens.
Fixes: 1ff412ad77 ("bonding: change the bond's vlan syncing functions with the standard ones")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sinan Kaya says:
====================
netdev: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
I did a regex search for wmb() followed by writel() in each drivers
directory.
I scrubbed the ones I care about in this series.
I considered "ease of change", "popular usage" and "performance critical
path" as the determining criteria for my filtering.
We used relaxed API heavily on ARM for a long time but
it did not exist on other architectures. For this reason, relaxed
architectures have been paying double penalty in order to use the common
drivers.
Now that relaxed API is present on all architectures, we can go and scrub
all drivers to see what needs to change and what can remain.
We start with mostly used ones and hope to increase the coverage over time.
It will take a while to cover all drivers.
Feel free to apply patches individually.
Changes since v6:
- bring back amazon ena and add mmiowb, remove
ena_com_write_sq_doorbell_rel().
- remove extra mmiowb in bnx2x
- correct spelling mistake in bnx2x: Replace doorbell barrier() with wmb()
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Code includes barrier() followed by writel(). writel() already has a
barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Create a new wrapper function with relaxed write operator. Use the new
wrapper when a write is following a barrier().
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed() and adding mmiowb() for ordering protection.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier on
some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Create a new wrapper function with relaxed write operator. Use the new
wrapper when a write is following a wmb().
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Also add mmiowb() so that write code doesn't move outside of scope.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier on
some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
register write.
Create a new wrapper function with relaxed write operator. Use the new
wrapper when a write is following a wmb().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a
barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing
the register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
barrier() doesn't guarantee memory writes to be observed by the hardware on
all architectures. barrier() only tells compiler not to move this code
with respect to other read/writes.
If memory write needs to be observed by the HW, wmb() is the right choice.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a
barrier on some architectures like arm64.
This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing
the register write.
Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
writel_relaxed().
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
