Because wake_up() takes an IRQ-safe lock, it can be expensive,
especially to call inside of a single-threaded completion handler.
What's more, the Send wait queue almost never has waiters, so
most of the time, this is an expensive no-op.
As always, the goal is to reduce the average overhead of each
completion, because a transport's completion handlers are single-
threaded on one CPU core. This change reduces CPU utilization of
the Send completion thread by 2-3% on my server.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-By: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
After calling vfs_test_lock() the pointer to a conflicting lock can be
returned, and that lock is not guarunteed to be owned by nlm. In that
case, we cannot cast it to struct nlm_lockowner. Instead return the pid
of that conflicting lock.
Fixes: 646d73e91b ("lockd: Show pid of lockd for remote locks")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
There's a few cases that a string that is to be recorded in a trace event,
does not have a terminating 'nul' character, and instead, the tracepoint
passes in the length of the string to record.
Add two helper macros to the trace event code that lets this work easier,
than tricks with "%.*s" logic.
__string_len() which is similar to __string() for declaration, but takes a
length argument.
__assign_str_len() which is similar to __assign_str() for assiging the
string, but it too takes a length argument.
Note, the TRACE_EVENT() macro will allocate the location on the ring
buffer to 'len + 1', that will be used to store the string into. It is a
requirement that the 'len' used for this is a most the length of the
string being recorded.
This string can still use __get_str() just like strings created with
__string() can use to retrieve the string.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20210513105018.7539996a@gandalf.local.home/
Tested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Large splice reads call put_page() repeatedly. put_page() is
relatively expensive to call, so replace it with the new
svc_rqst_replace_page() helper to help amortize that cost.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Replacing a page in rq_pages[] requires a get_page(), which is a
bus-locked operation, and a put_page(), which can be even more
costly.
To reduce the cost of replacing a page in rq_pages[], batch the
put_page() operations by collecting "freed" pages in a pagevec,
and then release those pages when the pagevec is full. This
pagevec is also emptied when each RPC completes.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
A few useful observations:
- The value in @size is never modified.
- splice_desc.len is an unsigned int, and so is xdr_buf.page_len.
An implicit cast to size_t is unnecessary.
- The computation of .page_len is the same in all three arms
of the "if" statement, so hoist it out to make it clear that
the operation is an unconditional invariant.
The resulting function is 18 bytes shorter on my system (-Os).
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
A simplified version of the rtmutex slowlock function, which neither handles
signals nor timeouts, and is careful about preserving the state of the
blocked task across the lock operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.770228446@linutronix.de
Provide the necessary wrappers around the actual rtmutex based spinlock
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.712897671@linutronix.de
RT replaces spinlocks with a simple wrapper around an rtmutex, which turns
spinlocks on RT into 'sleeping' spinlocks. The actual implementation of the
spinlock API differs from a regular rtmutex, as it does neither handle
timeouts nor signals and it is state preserving across the lock operation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.654230709@linutronix.de
If function ovl_instantiate() returns an error, ovl_cleanup will be called
and try to remove newdentry from wdir, but the newdentry has been moved to
udir at this time. This will causes BUG_ON(victim->d_parent->d_inode !=
dir) in fs/namei.c:may_delete.
Signed-off-by: chenying <chenying.kernel@bytedance.com>
Fixes: 01b39dcc95 ("ovl: use inode_insert5() to hash a newly created inode")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/e6496a94-a161-dc04-c38a-d2544633acb4@bytedance.com/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
We have the following header dependency problem on RT:
- <linux/rtmutex.h> needs the definition of 'struct rb_root_cached'.
- <linux/rbtree.h> includes <linux/kernel.h>, which includes <linux/spinlock.h>
That works nicely for non-RT enabled kernels, but on RT enabled kernels
spinlocks are based on rtmutexes, which creates another circular header
dependency as <linux/spinlocks.h> will require <linux/rtmutex.h>.
Include <linux/rbtree_types.h> instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.598003167@linutronix.de
So we have this header dependency problem on RT:
- <linux/rtmutex.h> needs the definition of 'struct rb_root_cached'.
- <linux/rbtree.h> includes <linux/kernel.h>, which includes <linux/spinlock.h>.
That works nicely for non-RT enabled kernels, but on RT enabled kernels
spinlocks are based on rtmutexes, which creates another circular header
dependency, as <linux/spinlocks.h> will require <linux/rtmutex.h>.
Split out the type definitions and move them into their own header file so
the rtmutex header can include just those.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.542123501@linutronix.de
The inclusion of printk.h leads to a circular dependency if spinlock_t is
based on rtmutexes on RT enabled kernels.
Include only atomic.h (xchg()) and cache.h (__read_mostly) which is all
what debug_locks.h requires.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.484161136@linutronix.de
qlcnic_83xx_unlock_flash() is called on all paths after we call
qlcnic_83xx_lock_flash(), except for one error path on failure
of QLCRD32(), which may cause a deadlock. This bug is suggested
by a static analysis tool, please advise.
Fixes: 81d0aeb0a4 ("qlcnic: flash template based firmware reset recovery")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816131405.24024-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
rtmutex only needs raw_spinlock_t, but it includes spinlock_types.h, which
is not a problem on an non RT enabled kernel.
RT kernels substitute regular spinlocks with 'sleeping' spinlocks, which
are based on rtmutexes, and therefore must be able to include rtmutex.h.
Include <linux/spinlock_types_raw.h> instead.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.428224188@linutronix.de
Move raw_spinlock into its own file. Prepare for RT 'sleeping spinlocks', to
avoid header recursion, as RT locks require rtmutex.h, which in turn requires
the raw spinlock types.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.371269088@linutronix.de
Guard the regular sleeping lock specific functionality, which is used for
rtmutex on non-RT enabled kernels and for mutex, rtmutex and semaphores on
RT enabled kernels so the code can be reused for the RT specific
implementation of spinlocks and rwlocks in a different compilation unit.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.311535693@linutronix.de
Add an rtlock_task pointer to rt_mutex_wake_q, which allows to handle the RT
specific wakeup for spin/rwlock waiters. The pointer is just consuming 4/8
bytes on the stack so it is provided unconditionaly to avoid #ifdeffery all
over the place.
This cannot use a regular wake_q, because a task can have concurrent wakeups which
would make it miss either lock or the regular wakeups, depending on what gets
queued first, unless task struct gains a separate wake_q_node for this, which
would be overkill, because there can only be a single task which gets woken
up in the spin/rw_lock unlock path.
No functional change for non-RT enabled kernels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.253614678@linutronix.de
Prepare for the required state aware handling of waiter wakeups via wake_q
and switch the rtmutex code over to the rtmutex specific wrapper.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.197113263@linutronix.de
To handle the difference between wakeups for regular sleeping locks (mutex,
rtmutex, rw_semaphore) and the wakeups for 'sleeping' spin/rwlocks on
PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels correctly, it is required to provide a
wake_q_head construct which allows to keep them separate.
Provide a wrapper around wake_q_head and the required helpers, which will be
extended with the state handling later.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.139337655@linutronix.de
Using a fixed delay of 1 microsecond has proven flaky in slow CPU environment,
e.g. Github Actions CI system. This patch adds exponential backoff with a cap
of 50ms to reduce the flakiness of the test. Initial delay is chosen at random
in the range [0ms, 5ms).
Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <fallentree@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817045713.3307985-1-fallentree@fb.com
Regular sleeping locks like mutexes, rtmutexes and rw_semaphores are always
entering and leaving a blocking section with task state == TASK_RUNNING.
On a non-RT kernel spinlocks and rwlocks never affect the task state, but
on RT kernels these locks are converted to rtmutex based 'sleeping' locks.
So in case of contention the task goes to block, which requires to carefully
preserve the task state, and restore it after acquiring the lock taking
regular wakeups for the task into account, which happened while the task was
blocked. This state preserving is achieved by having a separate task state
for blocking on a RT spin/rwlock and a saved_state field in task_struct
along with careful handling of these wakeup scenarios in try_to_wake_up().
To avoid conditionals in the rtmutex code, store the wake state which has
to be used for waking a lock waiter in rt_mutex_waiter which allows to
handle the regular and RT spin/rwlocks by handing it to wake_up_state().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.079800739@linutronix.de
The RT specific R/W semaphore implementation used to restrict the number of
readers to one, because a writer cannot block on multiple readers and
inherit its priority or budget.
The single reader restricting was painful in various ways:
- Performance bottleneck for multi-threaded applications in the page fault
path (mmap sem)
- Progress blocker for drivers which are carefully crafted to avoid the
potential reader/writer deadlock in mainline.
The analysis of the writer code paths shows that properly written RT tasks
should not take them. Syscalls like mmap(), file access which take mmap sem
write locked have unbound latencies, which are completely unrelated to mmap
sem. Other R/W sem users like graphics drivers are not suitable for RT tasks
either.
So there is little risk to hurt RT tasks when the RT rwsem implementation is
done in the following way:
- Allow concurrent readers
- Make writers block until the last reader left the critical section. This
blocking is not subject to priority/budget inheritance.
- Readers blocked on a writer inherit their priority/budget in the normal
way.
There is a drawback with this scheme: R/W semaphores become writer unfair
though the applications which have triggered writer starvation (mostly on
mmap_sem) in the past are not really the typical workloads running on a RT
system. So while it's unlikely to hit writer starvation, it's possible. If
there are unexpected workloads on RT systems triggering it, the problem
has to be revisited.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211303.016885947@linutronix.de
On PREEMPT_RT, rw_semaphores and rwlocks are substituted with an rtmutex and
a reader count. The implementation is writer unfair, as it is not feasible
to do priority inheritance on multiple readers, but experience has shown
that real-time workloads are not the typical workloads which are sensitive
to writer starvation.
The inner workings of rw_semaphores and rwlocks on RT are almost identical
except for the task state and signal handling. rw_semaphores are not state
preserving over a contention, they are expected to enter and leave with state
== TASK_RUNNING. rwlocks have a mechanism to preserve the state of the task
at entry and restore it after unblocking taking potential non-lock related
wakeups into account. rw_semaphores can also be subject to signal handling
interrupting a blocked state, while rwlocks ignore signals.
To avoid code duplication, provide a shared implementation which takes the
small difference vs. state and signals into account. The code is included
into the relevant rw_semaphore/rwlock base code and compiled for each use
case separately.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.957920571@linutronix.de
Provide rt_mutex_base_is_locked(), which will be used for various wrapped
locking primitives for RT.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.899572818@linutronix.de
Split the inner workings of rt_mutex_slowlock() out into a separate
function, which can be reused by the upcoming RT lock substitutions,
e.g. for rw_semaphores.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.841971086@linutronix.de
RT builds substitutions for rwsem, mutex, spinlock and rwlock around
rtmutexes. Split the inner working out so each lock substitution can use
them with the appropriate lockdep annotations. This avoids having an extra
unused lockdep map in the wrapped rtmutex.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.784739994@linutronix.de
Prepare for reusing the inner functions of rtmutex for RT lock
substitutions: introduce kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c and move
them there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.726560996@linutronix.de
Allows the compiler to generate better code depending on the architecture.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.668958502@linutronix.de
Inlines are type-safe...
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.610830960@linutronix.de
There are no more users left.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.552218335@linutronix.de
The only user of rt_mutex_is_locked() is an anti-pattern, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.491442626@linutronix.de
The RT specific spin/rwlock implementation requires special handling of the
to be woken waiters. Provide a WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER(), which can be used by
the rtmutex code to implement an RT aware wake_q derivative.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.429918071@linutronix.de
RT enabled kernels substitute spin/rwlocks with 'sleeping' variants based
on rtmutexes. Blocking on such a lock is similar to preemption versus:
- I/O scheduling and worker handling, because these functions might block
on another substituted lock, or come from a lock contention within these
functions.
- RCU considers this like a preemption, because the task might be in a read
side critical section.
Add a separate scheduling point for this, and hand a new scheduling mode
argument to __schedule() which allows, along with separate mode masks, to
handle this gracefully from within the scheduler, without proliferating that
to other subsystems like RCU.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.372319055@linutronix.de
PREEMPT_RT needs to hand a special state into __schedule() when a task
blocks on a 'sleeping' spin/rwlock. This is required to handle
rcu_note_context_switch() correctly without having special casing in the
RCU code. From an RCU point of view the blocking on the sleeping spinlock
is equivalent to preemption, because the task might be in a read side
critical section.
schedule_debug() also has a check which would trigger with the !preempt
case, but that could be handled differently.
To avoid adding another argument and extra checks which cannot be optimized
out by the compiler, the following solution has been chosen:
- Replace the boolean 'preempt' argument with an unsigned integer
'sched_mode' argument and define constants to hand in:
(0 == no preemption, 1 = preemption).
- Add two masks to apply on that mode: one for the debug/rcu invocations,
and one for the actual scheduling decision.
For a non RT kernel these masks are UINT_MAX, i.e. all bits are set,
which allows the compiler to optimize the AND operation out, because it is
not masking out anything. IOW, it's not different from the boolean.
RT enabled kernels will define these masks separately.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.315473019@linutronix.de
Waiting for spinlocks and rwlocks on non RT enabled kernels is task::state
preserving. Any wakeup which matches the state is valid.
RT enabled kernels substitutes them with 'sleeping' spinlocks. This creates
an issue vs. task::__state.
In order to block on the lock, the task has to overwrite task::__state and a
consecutive wakeup issued by the unlocker sets the state back to
TASK_RUNNING. As a consequence the task loses the state which was set
before the lock acquire and also any regular wakeup targeted at the task
while it is blocked on the lock.
To handle this gracefully, add a 'saved_state' member to task_struct which
is used in the following way:
1) When a task blocks on a 'sleeping' spinlock, the current state is saved
in task::saved_state before it is set to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT.
2) When the task unblocks and after acquiring the lock, it restores the saved
state.
3) When a regular wakeup happens for a task while it is blocked then the
state change of that wakeup is redirected to operate on task::saved_state.
This is also required when the task state is running because the task
might have been woken up from the lock wait and has not yet restored
the saved state.
To make it complete, provide the necessary helpers to save and restore the
saved state along with the necessary documentation how the RT lock blocking
is supposed to work.
For non-RT kernels there is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.258751046@linutronix.de
In order to avoid more duplicate implementations for the debug and
non-debug variants of the state change macros, split the debug portion out
and make that conditional on CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y.
Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.200898048@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
RT kernels have an extra quirk for try_to_wake_up() to handle task state
preservation across periods of blocking on a 'sleeping' spin/rwlock.
For this to function correctly and under all circumstances try_to_wake_up()
must be able to identify whether the wakeup is lock related or not and
whether the task is waiting for a lock or not.
The original approach was to use a special wake_flag argument for
try_to_wake_up() and just use TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for the tasks wait state
and the try_to_wake_up() state argument.
This works in principle, but due to the fact that try_to_wake_up() cannot
determine whether the task is waiting for an RT lock wakeup or for a regular
wakeup it's suboptimal.
RT kernels save the original task state when blocking on an RT lock and
restore it when the lock has been acquired. Any non lock related wakeup is
checked against the saved state and if it matches the saved state is set to
running so that the wakeup is not lost when the state is restored.
While the necessary logic for the wake_flag based solution is trivial, the
downside is that any regular wakeup with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE in the state
argument set will wake the task despite the fact that it is still blocked
on the lock. That's not a fatal problem as the lock wait has do deal with
spurious wakeups anyway, but it introduces unnecessary latencies.
Introduce the TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT state bit which will be set when a task
blocks on an RT lock.
The lock wakeup will use wake_up_state(TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT), so both the
waiting state and the wakeup state are distinguishable, which avoids
spurious wakeups and allows better analysis.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.144989915@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
RT kernels have a slightly more complicated handling of wakeups due to
'sleeping' spin/rwlocks. If a task is blocked on such a lock then the
original state of the task is preserved over the blocking period, and
any regular (non lock related) wakeup has to be targeted at the
saved state to ensure that these wakeups are not lost.
Once the task acquires the lock it restores the task state from the saved state.
To avoid cluttering try_to_wake_up() with that logic, split the wakeup
state check out into an inline helper and use it at both places where
task::__state is checked against the state argument of try_to_wake_up().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.088945085@linutronix.de
RT mutexes belong to the LD_WAIT_SLEEP class. Make them so.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.031014562@linutronix.de
If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y is enabled then local_lock_t has an 'owner'
member which is checked for consistency, but nothing initialized it to
zero explicitly.
The static initializer does so implicit, and the run time allocated per CPU
storage is usually zero initialized as well, but relying on that is not
really good practice.
Fixes: 91710728d1 ("locking: Introduce local_lock()")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211301.969975279@linutronix.de
For fixing use-after-free during iterating over requests, we grabbed
request's refcount before calling ->fn in commit 2e315dc07d ("blk-mq:
grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter").
Turns out this way may cause kernel panic when iterating over one flush
request:
1) old flush request's tag is just released, and this tag is reused by
one new request, but ->rqs[] isn't updated yet
2) the flush request can be re-used for submitting one new flush command,
so blk_rq_init() is called at the same time
3) meantime blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() is called, and old flush request
is retrieved from ->rqs[tag]; when blk_mq_put_rq_ref() is called,
flush_rq->end_io may not be updated yet, so NULL pointer dereference
is triggered in blk_mq_put_rq_ref().
Fix the issue by calling refcount_set(&flush_rq->ref, 1) after
flush_rq->end_io is set. So far the only other caller of blk_rq_init() is
scsi_ioctl_reset() in which the request doesn't enter block IO stack and
the request reference count isn't used, so the change is safe.
Fixes: 2e315dc07d ("blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter")
Reported-by: "Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@uni-muenster.de>
Tested-by: "Blank-Burian, Markus, Dr." <blankburian@uni-muenster.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811142624.618598-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Inside blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() we already grabbed request's
refcount before calling ->fn(), so needn't to grab it one more time
in blk_mq_check_expired().
Meantime remove extra request expire check in blk_mq_check_expired().
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811155202.629575-1-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
There's no need to print a message on every change in battery percentage
on regular log levels.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak <sebastian.krzyszkowiak@puri.sm>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
